Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Evaluating Sources

How to identify what sources you should use for your research

What are you using that source for?

In order to be able to evaluate a source, you need to think about how you are going to use that source in your research. A framework for looking at what your source is being used for is BEAM.

BEAM

Background Sources

  • Rely on them for information accepted as unquestionable fact
  • Will sometimes be uncited if considered "common knowledge," which is information in a discipline or subject that is universally accepted by those in the field
    • Ex. The existence of natural selection is a given in biology, so Darwin's On the Origin of Species does not need to be cited to prove it

Exhibit Sources

  • Materials a writer is interpreting or analyzing
  • Used to provide an example of or give evidence for a claim
  • Depending on your topic and discipline, exhibit materials can be a novel, a data set, an interview, experimental results, a diary, scholarly books or articles, and much more
    • Ex. If you are researching depictions of working women on TV, an episode of 30 Rock could be an exhibit. If you are researching changes in employment in the United States, a data set from the Bureau of Labor Statistics might be your exhibit

Argument Sources

  • Information from other authors you are agreeing with, disagreeing with, or building upon
  • Citing them puts your research in the context of other scholarship on that topic--brings you into the conversation
  • The literature review section in many disciplines
  • You use your exhibit sources as examples of why you agree with, disagree with, or want to add more to what was claimed in your argument sources

Method Sources

  • Materials an author follows to determine how they are doing their research
  • Can include research procedures, theories, and sources of discipline-specific vocabulary
  • Some methods become so common in a field that scholars do not feel the need to cite them but will presume their readers will know them
    • Ex. Scholar who studies game theory in economics may presume their audience is familiar with the prisoner's dilemma, while a scholar in critical literacy studies may not define "reification" 

Citation

BEAM originally developed by Joseph Bizup.

Bizup, Joseph. "BEAM: A Rhetorical Vocabulary for Teaching Research-Based Writing." Rhetoric Review 27, no. 1 (2008): 72-86. doi:10.1080/07350190701738858